No, a law that “does not criminalize sexual acts with animals”

“This story seems crazy to me. Pascal Pratt was outraged on Monday over a new Spanish law that would “decriminalize sexual acts with animals”.

“I don’t know if you see the deal! », started By introducing the host on his show L’Heure des Pros, after an on-set discussion about the origins of Covid-19. “There is a lesson that I saw, this lesson is not conducted anywhere, he continued. According to the Spanish newspaper Mundo Toro, […] It’s over and if the animals are not harmed, sexual acts against animals are no longer considered a criminal offense. […]. This measure is established by a new law on animal welfare. »

An excerpt from the show went viral on Facebook and Twitter, sparking provocative comments. Pascal Pratt was not the only one concerned about the text of the law: the Polish Minister of Justice Also movedAttacking the transition to a left-wing government in power in Spain.

Fake off

A new law on animal welfare was passed by the Spanish Congress on February 9. However, the change that Pascal Pratt and Mundotoro refer to concerns penal law. As mentioned by our Spanish colleagues Malta And Neutral, the current text prohibits the “sexual exploitation” of animals. As Neutral points out, it’s a term that lends itself to different legal interpretations. “From now on, instead of sexual exploitation, all sexual acts with animals will be punishable,” the Ministry of Social Rights, which covers the text, summarized in Malta.

New text plans to punish Individuals causing injury “require veterinary treatment” to restore the animal to health. Those found guilty of such acts are subject to imprisonment, fines and bans from engaging in animal-related activities. Compared reinforced barriers For the current text. The text under discussion also provides for worst-case scenarios, for example, if the offender is the owner of the animal.

As Neutral reminds us, this introduction of precision about “injury” worries animal rights activists. How to allow something if it cannot be observed? The new text answers this in article 340 bis, paragraph 4. If there is no injury or no need for veterinary treatment, the penalties are light: fines, prohibition of work of public interest and profession related to animals. The text does not pave the way for jubila, as many Spanish sites worry about it.